Perforación intestinal por espina de pescado, revisión de la literatura científica y presentación de dos casos
Palabras clave:
perforación intestinal, cuerpos extraños, diagnóstico, diagnóstico por imagen, complicacionesResumen
La presentación clínica de las perforaciones intestinales secundarias a la ingestión involuntaria de espinas de pescado suele ser inespecífica, lo que hace difícil su diagnóstico. Por tratarse de un cuadro clínico relativamente frecuente y potencialmente fatal, es necesario establecer un diagnóstico temprano y una terapia quirúrgica inmediata.
En este artículo se hace una revisión de la literatura y se presentan dos casos clínicos de perforación intestinal por espina de pescado atendidos en el Hospital Universitario San Ignacio.
El propósito de este trabajo es revisar la literatura y reportar dos casos tratados en el Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.007
2. Pinero A, Fernández JA, Carrasco M, Riquelme J, Parrila P. Intes- tinal perforation by foreign bodies. Eur J Surg. 2000;166:307-9.
https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009140
3. Drakonaki E, Chatzioannou M, Spiridakis K, Panagiotakis G. Acute abdomen caused by a small bowel perforation due to a clinically unsuspected fish bone. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011;17:160-2.
https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3236-09.1
4. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A. Spiral CT and multidetec- tor-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1918-25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2430-1
5. Singh RP, Gardner JA. Perforation of the sigmoid colon by swallowed chicken bone: Case reports and review of literature. Int Surg. 1981;66:181-3.
6. Goh BK, Chow PK, Quah HM, Ong HS, Eu KW, Ooi LL, et al. Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract secondary to ingestion of foreign bodies. World J Surg. 2006;30:372-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0490-2
7. Société Medicale d'Emulation: Phlebitis from a fish-bone, which passed through the stomach, and penetrated the mesenteric vein. Prov Med Surg J. 1841;3:77.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-3.4.77
8. Al-Muhanna A, Abu-Chra KA, Dashti H, Behbehani A, al- Naqeeb N. Thyroid lobectomy for removal of a fish bone. J Laryngol Otol. 1990;104:511-2.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100113039
9. Bendet E. Thyroid lobectomy for removal of a fish bone. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:157.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100115233
10. Coret A, Heyman Z, Bendet E, Amitai M, Itzchak I, Kronberg J. Thyroid abscess resulting from transesophageal migration of a fish bone: Ultrasound appearance. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:152-4.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870210215
11. Foo TH. Migratory fish bone in the thyroid gland. Singapore Med J. 1993;34:142-4.
12. Sharland MG, McCaughan BC. Perforation of the esophagus by a fish bone leading to cardiac tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:969-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90368-R
13. Remes-Troche J, Salazar L, Peña E. Extracción endoscópica de espina de pescado en el esófago cervical. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2010;75:326-7.
14. González M, Gómez M, Otero W. Cuerpos extraños en esófago. Rev Col Gastroenterol.2006;21:150-161.
15. Selivanov V, Sheldon GF, Cello JP, Crass RA. Management of foreign body ingestion. Ann Surg. 1984;199:187-91.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198402000-00010
16. Velitchkov NG, Grigorov GI, Losanoff JE, Kjossev KT.Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract: Retrospective analysis of 542 cases. World J Surg. 1996;20:1001-5.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900152
17. Theodoropoulou A, Roussomoustakaki M, Michalodimitrakis MN, Kanaki C, Kouroumalis EA. Fatal hepatic abscess caused by a fish bone. Lancet. 2002;359:977.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07999-0
18. Goh BK, Jeyaraj PR, Chan HS, Ong HS, Agasthian T, Chang KT, et al. A case of fish bone perforation of the stomach mi- micking a locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:1935-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-004-9595-y
19. Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP, Huang JF. CT evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:329-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00204-3
20. Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, De Maertelaer V, Rub- esova E, Capelluto E, et al. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1179-83.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1179
21. Furukawa A, Sakoda M, Yamasaki M, Kono N, Tanaka T, Nitta N, et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:524-34.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0289-x
22. Imuta M, Awai K, Nakayama Y, Murata Y, Asao C, Matsukawa T, et al. Multidetector CT findings suggesting a perforation site in the gastrointestinal tract: Analysis in surgically confirmed 155 patients. Radiat Med. 2007;25:113-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-006-0112-4
23. Maniatis V, Chryssikopoulos H, Roussakis A, Kalamara C, Kavadias S, Papadopoulos A, et al. Perforation of the alimentary tract: Evaluation with computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:373-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000022
24. Ongolo-Zogo P, Borson O, García P, Gruner L, Valette PJ. Acute gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation: Contrast-enhanced and thin-section spiral CT findings in 10 patients. Abdom Imaging. 1999;24:329-32.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900509
25. Fultz PJ, Skucas J, Weiss SL. CT in upper gastrointestinal tract perforations secondary to peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Radiol. 1992;17:5-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888496
26. Stapakis JC, Thickman D. Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: Abdominal CT Vs. upright chest film. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16:713-6.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199209000-00008
27. Kwok KY, Wing TS, Chun NT, Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:60-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017
28. Ordoñez CA, Puyana JC. Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86:1323-49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2006.09.006
29. Mai V, Morris JG. Colonic bacterial flora: Changing understan- dings in the molecular age. J Nutr. 2004;134:459-64.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.2.459
30. Condon RE. Microbiology of intra-abdominal infection and contamination. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1996;576:9-12.
https://doi.org/10.2165/00128413-199610670-00022
31. Chong AJ, Dellinger EP. Current treatment of intraabdominal infections. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:29-33.
32. FredericB, Karine P, CarolineM. Emergency laparoscopic management of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: A promi- sing alternative to more radical procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:654-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.018
33. Shukla PJ, Maharaj R, Fingerhut A. Ergonomics and technical aspects of minimal access surgery in acute surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:3-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-9226-6
34. Myers E, Hurley M, O'Sullivan GC. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2008;95:97-101.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6024
35. Martin RF, Rossi RL. The acute abdomen and overview and algorithms. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:1227-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70615-0
36. de Graff JS, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP. Primary small bowel anastomosis in generalized peritonitis. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:55-8.
37. Barker DE, Green JM, Maxwell RA, Smith PW, Mejia VA, Dart BW, et al. Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:784-93
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.039
38. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T, Cohen J, et al. Surviving sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:536-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2210-z
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todos los textos incluidos en la Revista Colombiana de Cirugía están protegidos por derechos de autor. Las opiniones expresadas en los artículos firmados son las de los autores y no coinciden necesariamente con las de los directores o los editores de la Revista Colombiana de Cirugía. Las sugerencias diagnósticas o terapéuticas como elección de productos, dosificación y métodos de empleo corresponden a la experiencia y al criterio de los autores.