Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Experience at the National Cancer Institute – Colombia

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30944/20117582.2735

Palabras clave:

colorectal neoplasms, colorectal surgery, minimally invasive surgical procedures, robotic surgical procedures, Latin America

Resumen

Introduction. The treatment of colorectal tumors requires a comprehensive approach, with surgical resection as the primary focus, usually accompanied by neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. The advantages of the robotic approach have allowed to gain an important place in rectal surgery, considering it a safe and reliable approach for these patients.

Methods. This is an observational, retrospective study that included patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who underwent robotic assisted surgery at the National Institute of Cancerology between 2017 and 2023. Surgeries were performed by a single console surgeon and various surgeons-in-training as assistants.

Results. A total of 43 patients were included in the study. 69.7% of patients had a tumor in the lower rectum, 20.9% in the middle rectum, and only 7.2% in the upper rectum. Low anterior or ultra-low anterior rectal resection was performed in 58.1% of patients and TaTME in 34.9%.The quality of the mesorectum was complete in 79%, almost complete in 18.6% and no patients had an incomplete mesorectum. Postoperative complications: 20.9%; 6.9% (n=3) had Clavien-Dindo complications >IIIa. Anastomotic leak rate: 9.3%.

Conclusion. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer may be technically advantageous compared to other techniques. It is a safe and feasible technique in Latin American countries, achieving optimal oncological results. In this report we highlight the results in the most important component of disease-free survival (negative CRM), which has determined its incorporation as the technique of choice in patients with rectal cancer in our institution.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias bibliográficas

Cui CL, Dornisch AM, Umlauf AE, Cuomo RE, Murphy JD, Lopez NE. International socioeconomic predictors of colon and rectal cancer mortality: Is colorectal cancer a first world problem? JCO Glob Oncol. 2021;7:1659-67. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00307

Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, et al. Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1291-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022

Cortés A, Bravo LE, García LS, Collazos P. Incidencia, mortalidad y supervivencia por cáncer colorrectal en Cali, Colombia, 1962-2012. Salud Pública Méx. 2014;56:457-64.

World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory - GLOBOCAN. Cancer today. Data version: Globocan 2022 (version 1.1) - 08.02.2024. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today

Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Azad N, Chen Y, Ciombor KK, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20:1139-67. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051

Abbas MA, Chang GJ, Read TE, Rothenberger DA, GarciaAguilar J, Peters W, et al. Optimizing rectal cancer management: Analysis of current evidence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:252-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000020

Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60485-2

Lam J, Tam MS, Retting RL, McLemore EC. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A comprehensive review of oncological outcomes. Perm J. 2021;25:21.050. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/21.050

Mullaney TG, Lightner AL, Johnston M, Keck J, Wattchow D. ‘Watch and wait’ after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88:836-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14352

Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, et al. Robotics in general surgery: Personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138:777-84. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777

Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:767-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0

Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. A Randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324-32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414882

Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N. Pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e165665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5665

Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Yang CS, Lee HJ. The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:O103-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14051

Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, Furutani A, et al. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4498-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x

Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1569-80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7219

Safiejko K, Tarkowski R, Koselak M, Juchimiuk M, Tarasik A, Pruc M, et al. Robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,731 patients. Cancers. 2021;14:180. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010180

Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-122

Villanueva-Sáenz E, Ramírez-Ramírez MM, ZubietaO’Farrill G, García-Hernández L. Experiencia inicial en cirugía colorrectal asistida por robot en México. Cir Cir. 2017;85:284-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.circir.2016.09.007

Hahn SJ, Sylla P. Technological advances in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022;31:183-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2022.01.001

Thomas A, Altaf K, Sochorova D, Gur U, Parvaiz A, Ahmed S. Effective implementation and adaptation of structured robotic colorectal programme in a busy tertiary unit. J Robot Surg. 2021;15:731-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01169-1

Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314:1346-55. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10529

Massala-Yila EF, Ali M, Yu W, Wang W, Ren J, Wang D. Evaluating body mass index’s impact on Da Vinci Robotic rectal cancer surgery, a retrospective study. J Robot Surg. 2024;18:22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01774-w

Suwa Y, Joshi M, Poynter L, Endo I, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2020;4:1042- 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50335

Pinilla-Morales RE, Guerrero-Macías S, Restrepo-López J, Aguirre-Bermúdez G, Guevara-Cruz O, Oliveros-Wilche R. Cirugía asistida por robot en el manejo de las neoplasias gastrointestinales. Resultados de los dos primeros años de implementación en una institución latinoamericana. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2023;27:281- 90. https://doi.org/10.35509/01239015.934

Zhang X, Wei Z, Bie M, Peng X, Chen C. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5601-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z

Xiong B, Ma L, Huang W, Zhao Q, Cheng Y, Liu J. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:516-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2697-8

Liu G, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Fu X, Liu X. Robotic surgery in rectal cancer: Potential, challenges, and opportunities. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022;23:961-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-00984-y

Collin A, Dahlbäck C, Folkesson J, Buchwald P. Total mesorectal excision quality in rectal cancer surgery affects local recurrence rate but not distant recurrence and survival: population-based cohort study. BJS Open. 2024;8:zrae071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae071

Grosek J, Ales Kosir J, Sever P, Erculj V, Tomazic A. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Radiol Oncol. 2021;55:433-8. https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0026

Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93-9. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388

Publicado

2025-04-02

Cómo citar

(1)
Pinilla-Morales, R. E.; Guerrero-Macías, S.; Caycedo-Marulanda, A.; Vélez-Bernal, J.; Rendón-Hernández, J.; Rey-Ferro, M.; Bonilla, A. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer. Experience at the National Cancer Institute – Colombia. Rev Colomb Cir 2025, 40, 736-744.

Número

Sección

Artículo Original

Métricas

Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas
Escanea para compartir
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo